2020 Voters Guide
Lieutenant GovernorAn Introduction | The Lieutenant Governor is elected independently of the Governor. The Lieutenant Governor acts as Governor if the Governor is unable to perform the official duties of the office and is first in line of succession if the Office of the Governor becomes vacant. The Lieutenant Governor is the presiding officer of the state Senate. The Governor and Lieutenant Governor positions are elected separately, thus officials may be from different political parties. In Washington State, there have been 17 Lieutenant Governors since the beginning of statehood, with three of those individuals having ascended to the Governor position upon the death of the elected Governor.

Denny Heck
Prefers Democratic Party
U.S. Representative, member of the House Permanent Select Committee on Intelligence and the House Financial Services Committee, Washington State Representative, elected to five terms. Chaired historic Basic Education Subcommittee and served as Democratic Precinct Committee Officer. Heck served as the Co-Founder and President of TVW – Washington’s version of C-SPAN, and as Chief of Staff for Governor Booth Gardner. He has a B.A. from Evergreen State College.
Responses to Tribe's Questions
To read about this candidate’s responses to the Snoqualmie Tribe’s questions, click through each question below.
Q1: What do you know about the Snoqualmie Tribe?
Response:
I’ve had the honor to meet with Snoqualmie tribal members on multiple occasions during my time in Congress. The Snoqualmie have lived in the Puget Sound region since time immemorial, but they lost their land in the 1800s when white settlers came to the region and lost federal recognition a century later. Federal recognition was restored in 1999, and just last year, the Snoqualmie Tribe reached a deal with the Muckleshoot Tribe to buy its ancestral homeland surrounding Snoqualmie Falls.
Q2: What is your experience working with Tribes?
Response:
I have been one of the biggest champions of Indian Country issues in Congress. I’ve worked in close partnership with Tribes and tribal stakeholders to introduce bills to reauthorize NAHASDA, to make it easier for Tribes to access homelessness assistance dollars, to direct more new markets tax credit dollars to Native communities, and to rescind the Medals of Honor awarded at the Wounded Knee Massacre. During the pandemic, I’ve closely engaged with my Tribes in district and tribal organizations to respond to the unprecedented need in Native communities.
Q3: What does the ideal government-to-government relationship with tribes look like to you?
Response:
The Federal-Tribal relationship should be a relationship of sovereigns and should affirm the principles of self-determination and self-government. The Federal government also has an important trust responsibility to protect lands, promote self-government, and provide assistance for the welfare of the Tribe and its members. The law is clear that states don’t have jurisdiction over Tribes, except when explicitly authorized by Congress. Though states don’t have authority over Tribes, I believe it behooves states to form a close government-to-government working relationship with sovereign Tribes and work to advance mutual interests and harmonize jurisdictional issues. I have a proven record of partnering with Tribes to work toward common goals, and I’d bring this work ethic into the office of LG. This dates back to my time working for Governor Gardner when we signed the Centennial Accord.
Q4: If elected, what would your Indian Country-related goals be?
Response:
I believe that state governments must work as partners with tribal governments with a mutual respect of sovereignty and a mutual recognition of the deep interconnections between lands under state and tribal jurisdiction. The coronavirus and accompanying economic collapse means both governments are facing common problems. The tribes and state are facing an unprecedented decline in revenue due to coronavirus and are responding to increased need in their communities, and I would prioritize cooperation on public health, tax policy, and economic development as we look to emerge from this pandemic stronger and more unified than before.
Q5: What is your knowledge of tribal treaties and trust obligations?
Response:
One of the most important duties I have as an elected official is to protect the sovereignty of Tribal nations and promote policies that deliver on the federal trust responsibility. A Tribal treaty defines the government-to-government relationship between the federal government and the Tribe. Treaties exist in perpetuity and neither party has the unilateral authority to change the conditions. The federal trust responsibility is the federal government’s legal obligation to protect land and resources, promote self-government, and care for the wellbeing of Tribes and their members.
Q6: Do you support increasing funding to tribes for services such as health care, cultural resources, and education?
Response:
Yes, I do. For far too long, the federal government has fallen short of its trust responsibility in these respects. We must reckon with this unfortunate history and strive to do better.
Q7: What do you know about free, prior, and informed consent (FPIC)? If elected, would you advocate for these principles to be included in legislation and policy?
Response:
Free, prior and informed consent (FPIC) is a process meant to ensure the free and full participation and consultation of Tribes when important decisions are being made. FPIC sets a high standard of tribal engagement, and if elected, I would do what I could to adhere to this high standard during important decisions.
Q8: What protections do you believe Tribal cultural resources and sacred sites should have?
Response:
Sacred sites and cultural resources are central to the heritage and cultural identity of tribal members. Indeed, the loss of these sites and resources literally means the loss of a cultures, religions, and histories. That’s why I believe they must have the highest degree of protection.
Q9: What do you believe is the best role of government in the fee to trust process for tribes to gain jurisdiction over their traditional lands?
Response:
The federal government has a unique role as the trustee of lands held in trust for tribes, but all levels of government can help tribes reassemble their traditional lands. One aspect of that is as a land owner. In the South Sound, the Nisqually Tribe has worked for years to add additional land from Bonneville Power Authority and Joint Base Lewis McChord, and I have been proud to continue to move that process forward. Unused and underused State and local governments lands should also be made available to tribes for conversion from fee to trust. In developed areas and on private lands, the process will usually be more difficult, but I am hopeful that the changes that I have worked to make in the reauthorization of NAHASDA will eventually make land conversions more viable there as well.
Q10: What do you know about the Snoqualmie Tribe's sacred site, Snoqualmie Falls? Do you support the Tribe's right to have a say in any future decisions made on its sacred site, including hydropower licensing?
Response:
The Snoqualmie Falls site is of great cultural and religious importance to the Snoqualmie. Tribal members believe that the mist from the falls lifts their prayers, and the traditional Snoqualmie burial site is nearby. I wholeheartedly support the Tribe’s right to consultation in future decisions about the site.
Q11: What role, if any, do you feel the State of Washington plays in Treaty Rights disputes?
Response:
Sadly, the State of Washington has often been an antagonist of the tribes in Treaty Rights disputes, but I believe that things have clearly changed for the better in the aftermath of the Boldt decision, and I have been a strong supporter of the collaborative process between the state, Northwest Indian Fisheries Commission and private parties regarding the primacy of tribes’ fishing rights. This should be the role of the state going forward: respecting the tribes’ treaty rights and working to ensure that conflicts between tribes and private parties are resolved quickly but fairly.
Q12: Do you support the Snoqualmie Tribe as a signatory of the Treaty of Point Elliot having equal rights to its fellow treaty signatory tribes?
Response:
Yes

Marko Liias
Prefers Democratic Party
State Senate Majority Floor Leader from 2018 – Present, State Senator of the 21st District from 2014 to Present, and State Representative in the 21st District from 2008 to 2014. He served as a Mukilteo City Councilmember from 2006-2008. He served as a professor at Everett Community College and founded a small family-owned construction company focused on green building. He has a Bachelor’s Degree from Georgetown University and a Masters from the University of Washington.
Responses to Tribe's Questions
To read about this candidate’s responses to the Snoqualmie Tribe’s questions, click through each question below.
Q1: What do you know about the Snoqualmie Tribe?
Response:
The Snoqualmie have been an integral part of the history in these lands, from their roots long before European settlers, to the continued stewardship of the east King County region today. I was very happy with the ruling this year that will further expand the Snoqualmie reservation lands. After years of fighting for better access to ancestral homelands, the federal decision is very past due, and I hope more like it materialize in the future.
Q2: What is your experience working with Tribes?
Response:
I’ve been glad to have the opportunity to work with tribal leaders around Washington on issues including natural resources, economic development and transportation. As Lt. Governor, I look forward to the statewide nature of the office to have the chance to interact with Tribes from every corner of Washington more directly.
Q3: What does the ideal government-to-government relationship with tribes look like to you?
Response:
Each sovereign government should work to support each other. Tribal and state governments have a unique position of all sharing land in a relatively small space, and have the opportunity to both benefit greatly from collaborative policy that supports both sides’ priorities and the betterment of this region that we call home.
Q4: If elected, what would your Indian Country-related goals be?
Response:
I would like to see governments have more control and influence over their own lands, such as the right to collect taxes within their jurisdiction. This year, I proudly co-sponsored and helped pass legislation recognizing the sovereignty of the Tulalip Tribe to collect taxes and I believe we should negotiate similar agreements with all tribes who want them. Additionally, I would love to see the state and Tribes working closer together on tourism related issues. Tribes around Washington have done incredible work to establish themselves as tourist destinations, from the beautiful resorts and gaming institutions to the pristine nature that can be enjoyed. The Lt. Governor is, by law, Chair of the Legislative Committee on Economic Development and International Relations, which is greatly involved in tourism efforts in Washington. As Chair, I would be interested in working with tribal leaders to find ways to collaborate on promoting Washington and tribal tourism together, benefiting all communities involved.
Q5: What is your knowledge of tribal treaties and trust obligations?
Response:
The tribal treaties as they stand are agreements between governments to cohabitate this land that both groups call home. I am saddened that the U.S. governments historically did not approach these in good faith and have used them to leverage native populations into one sided agreements, but we have an opportunity to remedy that now. As Lt. Governor, I look forward to collaborating with tribal governments to lift up historically marginalized communities.
Q6: Do you support increasing funding to tribes for services such as health care, cultural resources, and education?
Response:
Access to quality education is one of the number one contributing factors to higher wages and standards of living. I am proud to have supported full funding for our K-12 schools and the largest investment in higher education in state history, but we need to make a concerted effort to ensure that underserved communities, especially Native communities, are able to access those resources. The same goes for health care and other resources. I firmly believe that this is a time when we need universal, single-payer healthcare, so insurance companies can’t decide not to cover certain services in certain areas – especially in rural areas where need is high. This is a time to take bold action to address and correct historic inequities.
Q7: What do you know about free, prior, and informed consent (FPIC)? If elected, would you advocate for these principles to be included in legislation and policy?
Response:
FPIC allows for Native peoples to participate directly in the future direction of their ancestral land. Centering equity and social justice means including the voices of impacted communities in the formation of policy, not once the decision has already been made.
Q8: What protections do you believe Tribal cultural resources and sacred sites should have?
Response:
Our indigenous people have been stewards of our land and waters since time immemorial. We should treat tribal cultural and sacred sites with the same reverence and respect we treat post- colonial historical and cultural landmarks. I was proud to cosponsor legislation with Sen. John McCoy to ensure tribal consultation in permitting processes that involve cultural resources and sacred sites.
Q9: What do you believe is the best role of government in the fee to trust process for tribes to gain jurisdiction over their traditional lands?
Response:
While this is a federal process, the Governor does play a role as well. I believe that state authority should be exercised after engaging in government to government consultation with affected tribal governments.
Q10: What do you know about the Snoqualmie Tribe's sacred site, Snoqualmie Falls? Do you support the Tribe's right to have a say in any future decisions made on its sacred site, including hydropower licensing?
Response:
I am pleased that the Snoqualmie Tribe was able to purchase the area, but it shouldn’t have had to be purchased by the Tribe in the first place. Preservation of these sacred lands should be a priority of the state going forward, to maintain the rich importance and history of the land, and to benefit the surrounding environment. The Tribe owns the land and should be part of the discussion around future developments.
Going forward, we must take bold action to address the climate crisis and protect our one shared home, in this way we can preserve Snoqualmie Falls and our clean air and water. We must also continue to invest in salmon restoration, including the removal of fish-blocking culverts. And we must continue to strengthen government to government dialogues to protect and enhance our shared natural resources.
Q11: What role, if any, do you feel the State of Washington plays in Treaty Rights disputes?
Response:
Since the treaties were signed between the United States and sovereign tribes, the state role should be limited. We must proactively protect the treaty rights of tribes in state decisions and engage in government to government dialogue where there are disputes.
Q12: Do you support the Snoqualmie Tribe as a signatory of the Treaty of Point Elliot having equal rights to its fellow treaty signatory tribes?
Response:
Yes, all tribes should have equal rights as signatories to the Treaty.